The FIFTH CIRCUIT still refuses TO MAKE AN HONEST NEWSPAPER out of the WASHINGTON POST

[johnkarls]

.

**********
Ancient History and Current History

It is always fun for an 81-year-old history buff to combine ancient and current history in a hopefully-eye-catching title.

For my generation, “shotgun wedding” before “the pill” meant the bride was pregnant and her father was forcing her lover at gunpoint to marry her.

For the modern generation, “Shotgun Wedding” means the 2022 movie starring “J Lo” (for my generation, that means Jennifer Lopez) in which the bride assembles her relatives and prospective in-laws for the ultimate “destination wedding” where all of them are kidnapped.

But back to the pre-pill “shotgun wedding” –

And the Merriam-Webster definition of “to make an honest WOMAN out of YOU” which is –

“to marry a woman, especially a woman one has already had sex with.”

[OMG, what happened to the old rule against ending a sentence with a preposition, Merriam Webster???]


**********
The Washington Post’s July 14 Article Claiming the Fifth Circuit Had Paused The District Court’s Preliminary Injunction

Please see the WaPo article embedded in our July 14 posting at viewtopic.php?f=749&t=2371&sid=9a7b9a09 ... 3073f9ce82.


**********
Fifth Circuit Refuses [on July 14] To Disclose Its Ruling To The Public

Please see our posting with this title (sans the parenthetical) at viewtopic.php?f=749&t=2372&sid=9a7b9a09 ... d3073f9ce8.

In that posting, we identified –

(1) the 5 “opinions/orders” which were “published” on July 14, and

(2) the 6 “opinions/orders” which were NOT “published” but were made on July 14.


**********
Fifth Circuit Refuses (through yesterday Tuesday July 17) to Disclose Its Ruling (or Even The Existence of a Ruling) To The Public – Raising the Question whether The Washington Post is “An Honest Woman”

NB: As stated in the last sentence before the text of the Washington Post article in the posting referenced in the second-preceding section of this posting-

“Since Reading Liberally is a non-partisan public-policy study/action organization, it is respectfully suggested that we focus in our July 19 meeting on the public policy in this imbroglio, rather than the procedural developments that are occurring with increasing frequency.”

Accordingly, the following information is provided SOLELY for completing the record as of the beginning of our July 18 meeting this evening.

ALSO NOTA BENE THAT THE FIFTH CIRCUIT’S CASE NUMBER FOR THE APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS 23-30445 PER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S “MOTION” COMPRISING THE APPEAL – the text of which is available for download in “Fed Gov Finally Files Its Emergency Appeal of the Preliminary Injunction on July 10” at viewtopic.php?f=749&t=2369&sid=a55d6467 ... 0904f526dd.


*****
”Opinions/Orders” issued on Friday July 14 –

Published

21-20553 07/14/2023 Fisher v. Moore
22-30164 07/14/2023 Weyerhaeuser v. Burlington Insurance
22-30241 07/14/2023 Smith v. Lee
22-30435 07/14/2023 USA v. Gaulden
22-30488 07/14/2023 Johnson v. Cooper T. Smith Stevedoring

Unpublished

22-10305 07/14/2023 USA v. Jacquot
22-11000 07/14/2023 Sprint Corp v. Shichinin, L.L.C.
22-40508 07/14/2023 USA v. Bates
22-40839 07/14/2023 USA v. Bolden
22-50406 07/14/2023 USA v. Munoz
23-60077 07/14/2023 USA v. Lafleur


****
“Opinions/Orders” issued on Monday July 17 –

Published

21-30446 07/17/2023 Parker v. LeBlanc
21-50118 07/17/2023 USA v. Baez-Adriano
22-20363 07/17/2023 Garcia-Ascanio v. Spring Indep Sch Dist

Unpublished

21-30179 07/17/2023 USA v. Richard
22-10595 07/17/2023 USA v. Felder
22-10965 07/17/2023 USA v. Ramirez
22-20423 07/17/2023 Zinsou v. Fort Bend County
22-30240 07/17/2023 Granier v. Hooper
22-40607 07/17/2023 USA v. Campbell
22-50893 07/17/2023 USA v. Montoya
22-50904 07/17/2023 Perez v. Hijar
23-10095 07/17/2023 USA v. Delrio Rivera
23-50083 07/17/2023 USA v. Gamez
23-50084 07/17/2023 USA v. Fajardo-Ruiz


*****
“Opinions/Orders” issued on Monday July 17 –

Published

22-20341 07/18/2023 Austin v. City of Pasadena
22-40440 07/18/2023 Shenzen Synergy Digital v. Mingtel
22-70005 07/18/2023 Johnson v. Lumpkin


Unpublished

22-30147 07/18/2023 Womack v Dometic Corporation
22-30720 07/18/2023 Weiser v. Castille
22-50497 07/18/2023 USA v. Rubio
22-51033 07/18/2023 USA v. Juarez
23-10196 07/18/2023 USA v. Leiva-Melgar
23-40041 07/18/2023 USA v. Galvan-Hernandez
23-40042 07/18/2023 USA v. Juan Galvan-Hernandez
23-40058 07/18/2023 Ross v. USA
23-50064 07/18/2023 USA v. Hernandez-Roldan